FIGHTING JUDICIAL CORRUPTION AND HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES IN THE UK  
 
 

Synopsis

After suffering Unlawful Imprisonment as a consequence of Judicial Corruption at the hands of Justice Toulson, on behalf of his brother, (Alan Toulson) or brother’s Law Firm interest, (Reynolds Potter Chamberlain) Mr. Grant was Unlawfully denied redress due him in law by corrupt UK Judicial Authorities, in clear violations of both national and international obligations to respect Human Rights and the Rule of Law.

In light of wholesale failures and ineffectiveness of existing institutions both monitory and supervisory in the UK, (ranging from the former Lord Chancellor's Department, Ministry of Justice, Home Office, Local MPs, etc.,) to act on issues of gross convention right violations, (before them in complain since 1998 without genuine attempts at resolve or investigations of the underlying issues) led eventually to Mr. Grant having a recourse to rebellion as a last resort.

Continued arrogant refusal of UK Authorities to investigate and give due redress to Mr. Grant, (and any others like him with supporting documented evidence proving inconclusively their allegations of victimization) fails all expectations of decency and demonstrate an outright double standard propagation that those who devise, implement and execute the law in their various chambers and Courts, as above the law and not answerable to anyone, (most especially ordinary members of the pubic) with no financial clout to bring them to book via Private Legal Action for misdemeanors and improprieties, irrespective of the share weight of evidence.

With all access to the Civil Courts unlawfully blocked by a corrupt Judiciary acting contrary to the Rule of Law to safe guard the interest of long standing friends and colleagues, (both in the political and legal fraternities who put friends loyalty, secret society and lodge oaths as well as political party whips and interest ahead of civic duties and responsibilities to administer public office, Justly irrespective of social status) Mr. Grant was left with no option but the Criminal Courts to seek to get himself into by all means, to have his grievance heard and attain due redress for his Unlawful imprisonment follow up to the refusal by the European court of Human Rights to consider his application in 2001 on grounds that his approach was too late and out of the allowed time frame for bring such complaints before the courts.

Every living creature, man or animal, is entitled to self defence, self protection and self preservation. It is important to note for this reason Non-violent actions, (or even measured violent actions) carried out in the face of injustice was not invented by Mr. Grant. To prevent the need for such actions, the Rule of Law was established for all to observe and adhere to irrespective of social standing.

 

 

 


Library Picture

 

 
   
 
             

Site Designed by A. Balogun. For more Details contact the Campaign at +44 (0)208 5164668.
© 2007 Campaign for Truth & Justice