Mr. Grant's Overdue Discharge from Prison

Today 14 September 2009, Mr. Grant must be released by the UK Prison Authorities from HMP Hewell, after having served an additional 18months imprisonment term, for not being able to pay an UNLAWFUL Confiscation Order, no traceable evidence of assets (banked or properties belonging to him or his family) ever exist for, as required by law.

Without any address of Mr. Grants original complaint of UNLAWFUL IMPRISONMENT, the Campaign is now set to take its Public Awareness Demonstration Action to the heart of the nation, until the Corrupt Judiciary and immoral Members of Parliament that have remained silent on this issue demand a full public hearing and a proper (beyond mare rhetoric) accountability of the Judiciary, most especially the Justices Secretary who have failed the entire department, as process and procedure continue to go on being violated by members of the Judiciary.

Since Judge Pratt at Croydon Crown Court claimed that 'there is no Defence of Justification in English Law', whilst Green Peace activist successfully used the same defence on two separate occasions in two separate UK Courts, it stands to reason Judge Pratt was either mistaken, or an out right liar, set on a course to deliberately misdirect the Jury as to the law, in order to protect his colleagues and friends within the fraternity.  For after all, if all had been a genuine mistake, then why has the Judiciary, or the Ministry of Justice, or the Justices' Secretary (in their roles) not sighted the gross error and ensured, the mistake was corrected at the appeal process, if they were all not party to the corruption?

 

Court of Appeal Rejection of Mr. Grant's Writ of Habaes Corpus without Any Proper Hearing or Test of the Grounds

Although scheduled to be before him and Mr. Justice Silber tomorrow, it has been discovered that despite being self representing, Lord Justice Thomas has instructed the prison authorities holding Mr. Grant not to produce him for his Habeas Corpus application hearing for Court 3 at 10.30am on Tuesday 21st July 2009.

This is a strange and unusual request by LORD JUSTICE THOMAS on behalf of his employers (the Secretary of State for Justice) whose aim plainly is to disadvantage Mr. Grant's application hearing, in a manner which violates all principles of fair and independent tribunal under Article 6 of the Human rights Act 1998. 

When someone self representing is not allowed to be present in court for their own hearing the person will not be able to challenge and refute whatever fabrications and untruths, Defending parties like the Secretary of State for Justice may churn out to justify their actions and unlawfulness.

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/cms/list_admin.htm

ADMINISTRATIVE COURT SITTING IN LONDON
COURT 3
Before LORD JUSTICE THOMAS and MR JUSTICE SILBER
Tuesday 21 July, 2009
At  half past 10
Applications for Permission
CO/7637/2009 Grant v Secretary Of State For Justice
The hearing is open to the public and no one needs to register or make application in advance to be allowed to attend.  If you are able to attend please come along and witness the proceeding in the Courtroom and help ensure justice is delivered and the Judiciary made ACCOUNTABLE.

 

Mr. Grant Lodge Writ of Habeas Corpus Application to the High Court

Since being failed by another UK state authority controlled cowardly law firm unwilling to properly represent his interest via appropraite legal challenges in application to the Courts, with regards the UNLAWFULNESS of his imprisonment, Mr. Grant have had to dispense with their services in order to activate a serious action by way of an Habeas Corpus Application to the Courts himself.

Click to see Procedural Rules for dealing with Habeas Corpus Applications to the Courts

 

Final Campaign Letter sent Recorded Delivery to Prime Minister Gordon Brown at 10 Downing Street

Following both the Prime Minister (Gordon Brown) and his Ministerial Department's failures to investigate and take necessary actions to remedy legitimate complaints of Judicial corruption and UNLAWFUL IMPRISONMENT facts brought to their attentions, a final opportunity and reminder was given the Prime Minister to demand an accountability of Ministers and Ministerial Departments beyond superficial rhetoric’s.

Click to view a copy of the Letter

 

Imprisonment For Not Being able to pay Confiscation Order

After being refused parole on grounds that he refuses to drop his campaign for truth and justice, the corrupt UK authorities have gone ahead and retained Mr. Grant on a further unlawful 18 months imprisonment in total contravention of existing laws, for not being able to pay a confiscation order for over £85,000.00.  This is despite the fact that he was not given any access to court, to challenge the Unlawfulness of the conviction
Sentenced to 4 years imprisonment 6th February 2004, Mr. Grant’s term was scheduled to conclude 14/12/2008, but as the prison services do not release on weekends, his discharge should have occurred Friday 12th December 2008.  
The action of the authorities in enforceing a further 18 months on Mr. Grant for not being able to pay a confiscation order is Unlawful, outright corrupt with no basis in law, as you can only be imprisoned for not wanting to pay a fine if, you have it, not for not being able to pay it, because you don't have it to pay.

 

Prison Attack on Mr. Grant

Yesterday, Wednesday 15th October 2008, Mr. Caul Grant was attacked by a prison inmate at Wormwood Scrubs.  It is highly likely the unprovoked attack on Mr. Grant was orchestrated by the UK Government authority in a desperate attempt to pressurize him into discontinuing his campaign against the Judicial Authorities for their wholesale Violations of several Articles of the Convention Rights.

 

Parole Board Refuse Mr. Grant Parole because he continues his campaign for Justice in Prison

Despite the fact that Mr. Grant was Unlawfully Imprisoned without charge or trial (by Justice Toulson) in contravention of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (as enshrined in the Human Rights Act 1998) and was further Unlawfully denied redress due him in law under Article 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights, (as enshrined in the Human Rights Act 1998) it is difficult to comprehend how someone who had his enforceable rights violated by corrupted members of the Judiciary beyond all reasonable doubts be refused Parole for continuing to campaign for justice even while in prison. 

see a copy of the Parol;e Board's Decision and their reasons for not Granting parole as because of 'determination to carry on that campaign'

Locked up in prison for over 5years for the imprtation of Cannabis, Mr. Grant has had no right of appeal. At his trial, he relied on a defence of Justification. However the triel judge misdirected the jury by telling them that Mr. Grant's reasons or motive was irrelevant and that 'there is no defence of justification in English Law'. Following his conviction, Mr. Grant attempted to launch an appeal, but he was denied legal assistance and denied the right to represent himself. He has therefore had no access to court to challenge his conviction. This is Mr. Grantls final statement to the Parole Board

click to see Mr Grant's Final Statement to the Parole Board

 

Following the Uk Government and its Judicial Authority's long standing failure to properly investigate and give redress to evidence supported facts of Judicial Corruption and Unlawful Imprisonment complaints brought before it by this campaign, a petition has now been filed with the European Parliament Petitions Committee 27th November 2007.

click to see a copy of the Campaign's Petition and evidence enclosures to the European Parliament Petitions Committee

 

In line with the above, the campaign have received an acknowledgement from the European Parliament to the petition and now await the body to rule the petition Admissible or Inadmissible.

It is needless to say at this juncture, we seek an Admissible verdict and with the weight of evidence in consideration, the Parliament, in order to maintain its own credibility, will have no choice but Rule against the ongoing corruption and blatant abuse of the Rule of Law by current UK Judicial Authorities, who in procrastination, arrogance, deliberate strategy of delay and maladministration can't make up it's mind wether the issue is for the Home Office or the Ministry of Justice to resolve, as each continously pass responsibility from one to the other.

click to see European Parliament Petition's Committee Response dated 20/12/2007

 

---

Prior to filing a petition with the European Parliament's petitions committee, the campaign raised a petition with the UK Government. However, it was ignored and not investigated or acted upon by the authorities despite the seriousness of the charge contained within.

see a copy of the Campaign's earlier petition to the Prime Minister at 10 Downing Street which was never acted on.

 

perusal Petition on 10 Downing Street Website:
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/TruthandJustice/